Statistics Norway

Road goods transport

5 Comparisons with other Nordic countries. Tonnage carried. Million tonnes
  Norway1 Sweden Denmark Finland2
Tonnage carried        
National and international transports        
2000  222.2  329.3  223.8  421.6
2001  219.6  310.9  205.2  379.3
2002  215.5  321.7  209.3  420.1
2003  231.3  309.6  205.2  399.9
2004  244.5  325.0  191.7  400.1
2005  244.7  355.0  206.4  399.7
2006  251.3  342.3  193.0  397.6
2007  270.5  360.1  197.9  422.1
2008  289.4  367.4  193.5  423.6
2009  257.6  333.8  149.3  349.2
         
2010  266.8  322.1  165.7  350.9
1st quarter 54.9 69.5 34.9 :
2nd quarter 70.5 96.7 43.7 :
3rd quarter 72.9 76.0 44.8 :
4th quarter 68.5 80.0 42.3 :
         
2011        
1st quarter 55.2 80.5 38.1 :
         
National transports        
2000  218.4  322.4  206.9  415.5
2001  215.9  304.3  190.0  372.8
2002  211.7  315.1  194.1  414.0
2003  226.8  302.0  189.7  393.2
2004  240.4  318.4  174.8  392.3
2005  240.7  349.0  189.8  392.3
2006  245.2  334.2  177.6  360.5
2007  263.9  353.4  183.6  414.9
2008  282.8  360.6  179.3  417.7
2009  252.0  328.8  137.8  344.0
         
2010  260.9  315.6  156.7  397.1
1st quarter 53.5 67.9 32.6 84.2
2nd quarter 68.9 94.6 41.6 88.7
3rd quarter 71.5 74.9 42.9  104.4
4th quarter 67.0 78.3 39.7  119.8
         
2011        
1st quarter 53.7 78.7 35.8 66.3
         
International transport        
2000 3.8 6.8 16.9 6.1
2001 3.7 6.6 15.2 6.5
2002 3.8 6.7 15.6 6.1
2003 4.6 7.7 15.3 6.7
2004 4.1 6.5 17.0 7.8
2005 4.0 6.0 16.6 7.4
2006 6.1 8.0 15.4 7.1
2007 6.6 6.7 14.3 7.2
2008 6.6 6.7 14.4 5.8
2009 5.5 5.0 11.5 5.1
         
2010 5.9 6.5 9.0 6.9
1st quarter 1.4 1.6 2.3 :
2nd quarter 1.5 2.1 2.1 :
3rd quarter 1.4 1.1 1.9 :
4th quarter 1.5 1.7 2.7 :
         
2011        
1st quarter 1.5 1.9 2.3 :
1  As from 2006 the statistics on international transport with Norwegian lorries are calibrated against the external trade statistics. These figures are therefore not comparable with figures referring to earlier years.
2  As from 2011 the statistical methods have been changed for the Finnish data. These figures are therefore not comparable with figures referring to earlier years.

Explanation of symbols