8 | Sickness absence man-days for employees with more than 3 days sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Women. Quarterly figures. |
4th quarter 2001 | 1st quarter 20021 | Sickness absence rate | ||||||
County | Sickness absence man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence man-days |
Change last year | 4th quarter 2000 | 1st quarter 2001 | 4th quarter 2001 | 1st quarter 20021 |
TOTAL | 3 734 450 | 226 115 | 3 718 168 | -16 541 | 7,8 | 8,1 | 8,2 | 8,7 |
Østfold | 222 073 | 6 644 | 218 013 | -14 583 | 9,0 | 9,4 | 9,0 | 9,4 |
Akershus | 452 682 | 28 473 | 454 509 | -2 142 | 7,6 | 8,0 | 8,1 | 8,6 |
Oslo | 485 937 | 38 012 | 484 185 | 10 313 | 7,2 | 7,4 | 7,8 | 8,2 |
Hedmark | 156 765 | 13 171 | 156 270 | 1 731 | 8,3 | 8,7 | 8,9 | 9,4 |
Oppland | 153 977 | 8 166 | 154 184 | 2 275 | 8,5 | 8,6 | 9,0 | 9,6 |
Buskerud | 215 796 | 12 431 | 218 119 | -2 601 | 8,1 | 8,6 | 8,6 | 9,1 |
Vestfold | 165 791 | 10 101 | 162 932 | -5 012 | 7,5 | 7,9 | 7,8 | 8,2 |
Telemark | 131 283 | 6 495 | 129 500 | -3 237 | 8,2 | 8,5 | 8,8 | 9,2 |
Aust-Agder | 68 089 | 335 | 69 870 | -2 373 | 7,7 | 7,9 | 7,7 | 8,4 |
Vest-Agder | 112 538 | 8 620 | 109 846 | 674 | 7,9 | 8,2 | 8,6 | 8,9 |
Rogaland | 222 765 | 9 127 | 227 473 | 4 276 | 6,0 | 6,3 | 6,3 | 6,7 |
Hordaland | 345 542 | 14 740 | 354 106 | -8 043 | 7,6 | 8,2 | 7,9 | 8,6 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 72 010 | 5 208 | 70 776 | 845 | 6,8 | 7,0 | 7,3 | 7,6 |
Møre og Romsdal | 176 655 | 8 478 | 175 976 | 1 668 | 7,7 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 8,5 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 231 429 | 18 226 | 225 043 | 2 504 | 8,3 | 8,4 | 8,8 | 9,0 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 90 843 | 6 669 | 92 999 | 4 112 | 7,8 | 8,1 | 8,4 | 9,1 |
Nordland | 211 476 | 15 338 | 203 348 | -4 539 | 8,9 | 9,2 | 9,6 | 9,8 |
Troms | 145 461 | 10 597 | 137 961 | -4 893 | 8,9 | 9,1 | 9,6 | 9,7 |
Finnmark | 73 337 | 5 284 | 73 059 | 2 486 | 9,3 | 9,4 | 10,1 | 10,8 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2001. This is influential when we compare first quarter figuresfrom these two years. Both man-days lost due to sickness absence and scheduled man-days decrease significantly during Easter compared to a normal week at this time of the year. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have dropped 0.1-0.2 percentage points for most of the groups. |