9 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 4 2002 | Quarter 1 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 4 2001 | Quarter 1 20021 | Quarter 4 2002 | Quarter 1 2003 | |
TOTAL | 7 127 671 | 185 130 | 7 249 410 | 352 816 | 6,7 | 7,1 | 6,9 | 7,1 |
Østfold | 456 721 | 21 434 | 456 070 | 32 773 | 7,6 | 7,9 | 8,0 | 8,1 |
Akershus | 817 583 | 33 054 | 822 780 | 33 672 | 6,4 | 6,8 | 6,7 | 6,8 |
Oslo | 829 707 | -8 534 | 839 711 | 5 749 | 6,4 | 6,7 | 6,4 | 6,5 |
Hedmark | 311 137 | 9 713 | 316 356 | 18 181 | 7,5 | 7,9 | 7,8 | 7,9 |
Oppland | 305 233 | 13 051 | 310 468 | 14 025 | 7,4 | 8,0 | 7,8 | 8,0 |
Buskerud | 417 742 | 13 491 | 434 851 | 26 717 | 7,0 | 7,5 | 7,3 | 7,6 |
Vestfold | 333 611 | 20 464 | 337 463 | 27 328 | 6,4 | 6,8 | 6,9 | 7,0 |
Telemark | 267 784 | 7 502 | 273 553 | 17 791 | 7,3 | 7,7 | 7,6 | 7,9 |
Aust-Agder | 143 423 | 6 502 | 143 382 | 5 395 | 6,3 | 6,8 | 6,8 | 6,9 |
Vest-Agder | 234 414 | 2 263 | 236 656 | 14 270 | 7,1 | 7,2 | 7,2 | 7,4 |
Rogaland | 462 525 | 24 200 | 469 359 | 28 812 | 5,1 | 5,3 | 5,2 | 5,4 |
Hordaland | 672 724 | 20 109 | 686 694 | 32 688 | 6,4 | 6,8 | 6,6 | 6,8 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 143 146 | 2 391 | 146 004 | 7 049 | 6,0 | 6,3 | 6,1 | 6,3 |
Møre og Romsdal | 333 743 | 1 081 | 352 500 | 17 906 | 6,3 | 6,7 | 6,4 | 6,8 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 432 544 | 10 625 | 433 741 | 16 138 | 6,9 | 7,3 | 7,0 | 7,1 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 184 641 | 8 349 | 193 677 | 13 456 | 6,8 | 7,5 | 7,2 | 7,6 |
Nordland | 385 724 | -856 | 392 814 | 19 441 | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,8 | 8,1 |
Troms | 265 819 | 89 | 270 037 | 14 980 | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,8 | 8,0 |
Finnmark | 129 450 | 201 | 133 293 | 6 443 | 8,3 | 8,8 | 8,4 | 8,8 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2001. This is influential when we compare first quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have dropped approximately 0.1-0.2 percentage points for most of the groups. The yearly change from 1st quarter 2002 to 1st quarter 2003 would have been respectively higher. |