10 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Men. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 4 2002 | Quarter 1 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 4 2001 | Quarter 1 20021 | Quarter 4 2002 | Quarter 1 2003 | |
TOTAL | 3 239 982 | 82 268 | 3 285 767 | 162 216 | 5,4 | 5,7 | 5,6 | 5,8 |
Østfold | 219 263 | 8 260 | 220 704 | 17 605 | 6,5 | 6,7 | 6,8 | 7,0 |
Akershus | 338 978 | 14 153 | 342 035 | 15 007 | 4,8 | 5,2 | 5,1 | 5,2 |
Oslo | 342 666 | -946 | 342 715 | 2 683 | 4,9 | 5,2 | 5,0 | 5,0 |
Hedmark | 144 558 | 1 142 | 149 700 | 9 332 | 6,3 | 6,7 | 6,5 | 6,8 |
Oppland | 142 605 | 5 879 | 147 577 | 7 074 | 6,1 | 6,8 | 6,5 | 6,8 |
Buskerud | 193 904 | 7 981 | 201 676 | 14 296 | 5,7 | 6,1 | 6,1 | 6,4 |
Vestfold | 157 811 | 12 347 | 158 607 | 13 417 | 5,3 | 5,6 | 5,8 | 5,9 |
Telemark | 133 393 | 5 579 | 136 748 | 11 985 | 6,2 | 6,5 | 6,7 | 7,0 |
Aust-Agder | 72 918 | 4 685 | 72 837 | 5 244 | 5,3 | 5,7 | 5,9 | 6,1 |
Vest-Agder | 121 367 | 2 897 | 120 996 | 9 378 | 6,0 | 6,1 | 6,3 | 6,4 |
Rogaland | 219 790 | 7 988 | 220 057 | 11 242 | 4,1 | 4,3 | 4,2 | 4,3 |
Hordaland | 305 449 | 3 664 | 308 832 | 14 447 | 5,1 | 5,3 | 5,3 | 5,4 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 68 200 | 678 | 67 881 | 927 | 5,0 | 5,3 | 5,1 | 5,2 |
Møre og Romsdal | 155 740 | 2 339 | 160 850 | 5 227 | 4,9 | 5,3 | 5,1 | 5,4 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 189 655 | 1 468 | 188 951 | -1 013 | 5,4 | 5,9 | 5,5 | 5,5 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 90 810 | 6 278 | 93 898 | 7 538 | 5,6 | 6,2 | 6,2 | 6,5 |
Nordland | 171 701 | -1 124 | 174 659 | 7 176 | 6,3 | 6,5 | 6,4 | 6,5 |
Troms | 118 370 | 701 | 122 096 | 7 967 | 6,3 | 6,5 | 6,4 | 6,6 |
Finnmark | 52 804 | -1 700 | 54 948 | 2 683 | 6,6 | 6,9 | 6,5 | 6,9 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2001. This is influential when we compare first quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have dropped approximately 0.1-0.2 percentage points for most of the groups. The yearly change from 1st quarter 2002 to 1st quarter 2003 would have been respectively higher. |