11 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Women. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 4 2002 | Quarter 1 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 4 2001 | Quarter 1 20021 | Quarter 4 2002 | Quarter 1 2003 | |
TOTAL | 3 887 689 | 102 862 | 3 963 642 | 190 600 | 8,4 | 8,8 | 8,4 | 8,7 |
Østfold | 237 458 | 13 174 | 235 366 | 15 168 | 9,1 | 9,5 | 9,5 | 9,6 |
Akershus | 478 605 | 18 901 | 480 746 | 18 665 | 8,2 | 8,7 | 8,5 | 8,6 |
Oslo | 487 041 | -7 588 | 496 996 | 3 067 | 8,0 | 8,4 | 7,9 | 8,1 |
Hedmark | 166 579 | 8 571 | 166 656 | 8 849 | 9,0 | 9,5 | 9,2 | 9,3 |
Oppland | 162 629 | 7 172 | 162 891 | 6 952 | 9,1 | 9,7 | 9,3 | 9,5 |
Buskerud | 223 837 | 5 510 | 233 175 | 12 421 | 8,7 | 9,2 | 8,7 | 9,2 |
Vestfold | 175 800 | 8 117 | 178 856 | 13 911 | 7,9 | 8,3 | 8,2 | 8,5 |
Telemark | 134 390 | 1 922 | 136 805 | 5 806 | 8,8 | 9,3 | 8,8 | 9,3 |
Aust-Agder | 70 505 | 1 818 | 70 546 | 151 | 7,7 | 8,5 | 7,9 | 8,1 |
Vest-Agder | 113 047 | -633 | 115 660 | 4 892 | 8,7 | 9,0 | 8,6 | 8,8 |
Rogaland | 242 735 | 16 212 | 249 302 | 17 569 | 6,4 | 6,8 | 6,6 | 6,8 |
Hordaland | 367 275 | 16 445 | 377 862 | 18 241 | 8,1 | 8,7 | 8,3 | 8,6 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 74 945 | 1 713 | 78 123 | 6 122 | 7,4 | 7,7 | 7,3 | 7,8 |
Møre og Romsdal | 178 003 | -1 258 | 191 650 | 12 679 | 8,1 | 8,6 | 8,0 | 8,7 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 242 889 | 9 157 | 244 790 | 17 151 | 8,9 | 9,1 | 8,8 | 9,1 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 93 831 | 2 071 | 99 779 | 5 917 | 8,5 | 9,2 | 8,5 | 9,2 |
Nordland | 214 023 | 268 | 218 155 | 12 265 | 9,7 | 9,9 | 9,6 | 9,9 |
Troms | 147 450 | -612 | 147 942 | 7 014 | 9,8 | 9,9 | 9,5 | 9,6 |
Finnmark | 76 646 | 1 901 | 78 346 | 3 760 | 10,3 | 11,0 | 10,4 | 10,8 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2001. This is influential when we compare first quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have dropped approximately 0.1-0.2 percentage points for most of the groups. The yearly change from 1st quarter 2002 to 1st quarter 2003 would have been respectively higher. |