9 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 1 2003 | Quarter 2 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 1 2002 | Quarter 2 2002 | Quarter 1 20031 | Quarter 2 20031 | |
TOTAL | 7 249 410 | 352 816 | 6 582 050 | 194 586 | 7,1 | 6,6 | 7,1 | 7,1 |
Østfold | 456 070 | 32 773 | 409 171 | 9 855 | 7,9 | 7,5 | 8,1 | 8,1 |
Akershus | 822 780 | 33 672 | 748 163 | 25 548 | 6,8 | 6,3 | 6,8 | 6,8 |
Oslo | 839 711 | 5 749 | 772 130 | 842 | 6,7 | 6,3 | 6,5 | 6,6 |
Hedmark | 316 356 | 18 181 | 288 996 | 10 595 | 7,9 | 7,4 | 7,9 | 8,0 |
Oppland | 310 468 | 14 025 | 281 141 | 13 336 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 8,0 | 7,9 |
Buskerud | 434 851 | 26 717 | 392 016 | 17 441 | 7,5 | 6,9 | 7,6 | 7,6 |
Vestfold | 337 463 | 27 328 | 299 874 | 9 268 | 6,8 | 6,4 | 7,0 | 7,0 |
Telemark | 273 553 | 17 791 | 244 568 | 9 226 | 7,7 | 7,1 | 7,9 | 7,8 |
Aust-Agder | 143 382 | 5 395 | 127 578 | -2 363 | 6,8 | 6,5 | 6,9 | 6,8 |
Vest-Agder | 236 656 | 14 270 | 216 576 | 7 640 | 7,2 | 6,8 | 7,4 | 7,4 |
Rogaland | 469 359 | 28 812 | 429 013 | 18 121 | 5,3 | 5,0 | 5,4 | 5,4 |
Hordaland | 686 694 | 32 688 | 635 995 | 27 947 | 6,8 | 6,4 | 6,8 | 6,9 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 146 004 | 7 049 | 129 220 | 3 642 | 6,3 | 5,7 | 6,3 | 6,2 |
Møre og Romsdal | 352 500 | 17 906 | 312 874 | 7 501 | 6,7 | 6,2 | 6,8 | 6,7 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 433 741 | 16 138 | 397 889 | 14 459 | 7,3 | 6,7 | 7,1 | 7,2 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 193 677 | 13 456 | 174 805 | 8 489 | 7,5 | 6,9 | 7,6 | 7,6 |
Nordland | 392 814 | 19 441 | 354 363 | 5 605 | 8,0 | 7,5 | 8,1 | 8,0 |
Troms | 270 037 | 14 980 | 244 856 | 3 331 | 8,0 | 7,6 | 8,0 | 8,1 |
Finnmark | 133 293 | 6 443 | 122 725 | 4 006 | 8,8 | 8,2 | 8,8 | 9,0 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2003. This is influential when we compare first and second quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have risen approximately 0.1 percentage points for most of the groups in the first quarter 2002 and in the second quarter 2003. |