10 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Men. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 1 2003 | Quarter 2 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 1 2002 | Quarter 2 2002 | Quarter 1 20031 | Quarter 2 20031 | |
TOTAL | 3 285 767 | 162 216 | 2 943 234 | 52 657 | 5,7 | 5,3 | 5,8 | 5,7 |
Østfold | 220 704 | 17 605 | 193 288 | 6 312 | 6,7 | 6,2 | 7,0 | 6,8 |
Akershus | 342 035 | 15 007 | 309 103 | 11 954 | 5,2 | 4,7 | 5,2 | 5,2 |
Oslo | 342 715 | 2 683 | 319 714 | 1 919 | 5,2 | 4,9 | 5,0 | 5,2 |
Hedmark | 149 700 | 9 332 | 133 878 | 3 417 | 6,7 | 6,2 | 6,8 | 6,7 |
Oppland | 147 577 | 7 074 | 130 306 | 3 911 | 6,8 | 6,1 | 6,8 | 6,6 |
Buskerud | 201 676 | 14 296 | 178 324 | 7 725 | 6,1 | 5,6 | 6,4 | 6,2 |
Vestfold | 158 607 | 13 417 | 137 935 | 2 551 | 5,6 | 5,3 | 5,9 | 5,7 |
Telemark | 136 748 | 11 985 | 119 025 | 5 201 | 6,5 | 6,0 | 7,0 | 6,7 |
Aust-Agder | 72 837 | 5 244 | 63 096 | -716 | 5,7 | 5,4 | 6,1 | 5,8 |
Vest-Agder | 120 996 | 9 378 | 110 583 | 3 764 | 6,1 | 5,8 | 6,4 | 6,4 |
Rogaland | 220 057 | 11 242 | 195 671 | 1 071 | 4,3 | 4,0 | 4,3 | 4,2 |
Hordaland | 308 832 | 14 447 | 282 105 | 1 304 | 5,3 | 5,1 | 5,4 | 5,4 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 67 881 | 927 | 59 376 | -839 | 5,3 | 4,8 | 5,2 | 5,1 |
Møre og Romsdal | 160 850 | 5 227 | 143 276 | 851 | 5,3 | 4,9 | 5,4 | 5,3 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 188 951 | -1 013 | 172 965 | 76 | 5,9 | 5,3 | 5,5 | 5,6 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 93 898 | 7 538 | 82 537 | 3 160 | 6,2 | 5,7 | 6,5 | 6,3 |
Nordland | 174 659 | 7 176 | 154 440 | 180 | 6,5 | 6,0 | 6,5 | 6,4 |
Troms | 122 096 | 7 967 | 106 874 | -1 127 | 6,5 | 6,2 | 6,6 | 6,4 |
Finnmark | 54 948 | 2 683 | 50 718 | 1 924 | 6,9 | 6,4 | 6,9 | 7,2 |
00 | - | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | 2,0 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2003. This is influential when we compare first and second quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have risen approximately 0.1 percentage points for most of the groups in the first quarter 2002 and in the second quarter 2003. |