9 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 2 20031 | Quarter 3 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 2 2002 | Quarter 3 2002 | Quarter 2 20031 | Quarter 3 2003 | |
TOTAL | 6 582 050 | 194 586 | 6 742 336 | 277 030 | 6,6 | 7,1 | 7,1 | 7,4 |
Østfold | 409 171 | 9 855 | 422 542 | 8 232 | 7,5 | 8,3 | 8,1 | 8,6 |
Akershus | 748 163 | 25 548 | 764 107 | 24 712 | 6,3 | 6,9 | 6,8 | 7,1 |
Oslo | 772 130 | 842 | 775 051 | 2 896 | 6,3 | 6,8 | 6,6 | 6,9 |
Hedmark | 288 996 | 10 595 | 291 525 | 10 029 | 7,4 | 7,9 | 8,0 | 8,3 |
Oppland | 281 141 | 13 336 | 281 532 | 10 555 | 7,3 | 7,8 | 7,9 | 8,1 |
Buskerud | 392 016 | 17 441 | 397 928 | 22 903 | 6,9 | 7,4 | 7,6 | 7,9 |
Vestfold | 299 874 | 9 268 | 317 969 | 11 435 | 6,4 | 7,2 | 7,0 | 7,5 |
Telemark | 244 568 | 9 226 | 253 575 | 14 434 | 7,1 | 7,7 | 7,8 | 8,3 |
Aust-Agder | 127 578 | -2 363 | 135 494 | 1 580 | 6,5 | 7,2 | 6,8 | 7,4 |
Vest-Agder | 216 576 | 7 640 | 227 051 | 14 322 | 6,8 | 7,4 | 7,4 | 8,0 |
Rogaland | 429 013 | 18 121 | 448 037 | 29 085 | 5,0 | 5,3 | 5,4 | 5,7 |
Hordaland | 635 995 | 27 947 | 650 009 | 44 762 | 6,4 | 6,7 | 6,9 | 7,2 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 129 220 | 3 642 | 132 909 | 3 071 | 5,7 | 6,2 | 6,2 | 6,5 |
Møre og Romsdal | 312 874 | 7 501 | 315 452 | 10 994 | 6,2 | 6,6 | 6,7 | 6,9 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 397 889 | 14 459 | 409 028 | 22 006 | 6,7 | 7,2 | 7,2 | 7,5 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 174 805 | 8 489 | 182 448 | 18 140 | 6,9 | 7,2 | 7,6 | 8,1 |
Nordland | 354 363 | 5 605 | 366 110 | 14 803 | 7,5 | 8,1 | 8,0 | 8,5 |
Troms | 244 856 | 3 331 | 247 060 | 7 092 | 7,6 | 8,0 | 8,1 | 8,2 |
Finnmark | 122 725 | 4 006 | 124 243 | 5 714 | 8,2 | 8,7 | 9,0 | 9,3 |
99 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2003. This is influential when we compare first and second quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have risen approximately 0.1 percentage points for m |