10 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Men. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 2 20031 | Quarter 3 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 2 2002 | Quarter 3 2002 | Quarter 2 20031 | Quarter 3 2003 | |
TOTAL | 2 943 234 | 52 657 | 3 142 842 | 103 886 | 5,3 | 5,9 | 5,7 | 6,3 |
Østfold | 193 288 | 6 312 | 208 729 | 6 182 | 6,2 | 7,1 | 6,8 | 7,6 |
Akershus | 309 103 | 11 954 | 331 615 | 9 304 | 4,7 | 5,5 | 5,2 | 5,7 |
Oslo | 319 714 | 1 919 | 334 053 | 1 587 | 4,9 | 5,5 | 5,2 | 5,6 |
Hedmark | 133 878 | 3 417 | 140 442 | 6 095 | 6,2 | 6,8 | 6,7 | 7,2 |
Oppland | 130 306 | 3 911 | 136 084 | 4 999 | 6,1 | 6,7 | 6,6 | 7,1 |
Buskerud | 178 324 | 7 725 | 185 919 | 7 733 | 5,6 | 6,3 | 6,2 | 6,7 |
Vestfold | 137 935 | 2 551 | 152 424 | 3 761 | 5,3 | 6,2 | 5,7 | 6,5 |
Telemark | 119 025 | 5 201 | 125 707 | 4 914 | 6,0 | 6,8 | 6,7 | 7,3 |
Aust-Agder | 63 096 | -716 | 68 198 | 324 | 5,4 | 6,2 | 5,8 | 6,5 |
Vest-Agder | 110 583 | 3 764 | 119 542 | 7 953 | 5,8 | 6,5 | 6,4 | 7,2 |
Rogaland | 195 671 | 1 071 | 213 239 | 6 157 | 4,0 | 4,5 | 4,2 | 4,7 |
Hordaland | 282 105 | 1 304 | 301 950 | 18 934 | 5,1 | 5,5 | 5,4 | 6,0 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 59 376 | -839 | 65 021 | 1 837 | 4,8 | 5,3 | 5,1 | 5,7 |
Møre og Romsdal | 143 276 | 851 | 149 654 | 2 601 | 4,9 | 5,4 | 5,3 | 5,8 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 172 965 | 76 | 186 562 | 4 925 | 5,3 | 6,0 | 5,6 | 6,2 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 82 537 | 3 160 | 88 390 | 6 881 | 5,7 | 6,3 | 6,3 | 6,9 |
Nordland | 154 440 | 180 | 165 878 | 3 378 | 6,0 | 6,7 | 6,4 | 7,1 |
Troms | 106 874 | -1 127 | 113 307 | 2 027 | 6,2 | 6,8 | 6,4 | 7,0 |
Finnmark | 50 718 | 1 924 | 56 037 | 4 203 | 6,4 | 7,3 | 7,2 | 8,1 |
00 | 18 | - | 91 | - | - | - | 2,0 | 3,4 |
99 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2003. This is influential when we compare first and second quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have risen approximately 0.1 percentage points for m |