11 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Women. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 2 20031 | Quarter 3 2003 | Per cent | ||||||
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 2 2002 | Quarter 3 2002 | Quarter 2 20031 | Quarter 3 2003 | |
TOTAL | 3 638 816 | 141 929 | 3 599 494 | 173 144 | 8,2 | 8,5 | 8,8 | 8,9 |
Østfold | 215 884 | 3 542 | 213 813 | 2 050 | 9,2 | 9,7 | 9,8 | 9,9 |
Akershus | 439 060 | 13 594 | 432 493 | 15 407 | 8,1 | 8,5 | 8,7 | 8,8 |
Oslo | 452 417 | -1 078 | 440 998 | 1 309 | 7,8 | 8,2 | 8,1 | 8,2 |
Hedmark | 155 118 | 7 179 | 151 084 | 3 934 | 8,9 | 9,4 | 9,7 | 9,6 |
Oppland | 150 835 | 9 425 | 145 448 | 5 556 | 8,8 | 9,2 | 9,6 | 9,4 |
Buskerud | 213 692 | 9 715 | 212 009 | 15 170 | 8,5 | 8,8 | 9,3 | 9,4 |
Vestfold | 161 938 | 6 717 | 165 545 | 7 675 | 7,8 | 8,4 | 8,5 | 8,8 |
Telemark | 125 543 | 4 025 | 127 868 | 9 520 | 8,6 | 8,9 | 9,3 | 9,6 |
Aust-Agder | 64 482 | -1 646 | 67 296 | 1 256 | 8,0 | 8,5 | 8,2 | 8,7 |
Vest-Agder | 105 992 | 3 876 | 107 509 | 6 368 | 8,4 | 8,9 | 8,9 | 9,1 |
Rogaland | 233 342 | 17 050 | 234 798 | 22 928 | 6,4 | 6,5 | 7,0 | 7,1 |
Hordaland | 353 889 | 26 642 | 348 060 | 25 828 | 8,0 | 8,3 | 8,9 | 8,9 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 69 844 | 4 481 | 67 887 | 1 234 | 6,9 | 7,4 | 7,7 | 7,5 |
Møre og Romsdal | 169 597 | 6 650 | 165 798 | 8 393 | 7,9 | 8,1 | 8,5 | 8,4 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 224 924 | 14 384 | 222 466 | 17 081 | 8,4 | 8,6 | 9,2 | 9,2 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 92 268 | 5 329 | 94 058 | 11 259 | 8,5 | 8,5 | 9,3 | 9,6 |
Nordland | 199 922 | 5 424 | 200 232 | 11 425 | 9,4 | 9,7 | 10,0 | 10,2 |
Troms | 137 982 | 4 458 | 133 753 | 5 065 | 9,2 | 9,5 | 10,0 | 9,7 |
Finnmark | 72 007 | 2 082 | 68 206 | 1 510 | 10,2 | 10,4 | 10,9 | 10,6 |
00 | 81 | - | 175 | - | - | - | 9,9 | 9,4 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2002, and in the second quarter in 2003. This is influential when we compare first and second quarter figures from these two years. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness. If we did not take the easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have risen approximately 0.1 percentage points for m |