11 Sickness absence man-days1 for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Women. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 4 2005 | Quarter 1 20061 | Per cent | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Sickness absence- man-days |
Change last year | Quarter 4 2004 | Quarter 1 20051 | Quarter 4 2005 | Quarter 1 20061 | |
TOTAL | 3 447 307 | 202 549 | 3 797 697 | 602 656 | 6,8 | 7,3 | 7,4 | 7,9 |
Østfold | 198 424 | 6 849 | 221 744 | 40 067 | 7,6 | 7,8 | 8,0 | 8,6 |
Akershus | 418 069 | 19 280 | 463 214 | 65 585 | 6,9 | 7,4 | 7,4 | 7,9 |
Oslo | 433 866 | 13 217 | 477 181 | 58 404 | 6,5 | 7,0 | 6,9 | 7,3 |
Hedmark | 146 999 | 12 349 | 160 702 | 29 989 | 7,3 | 7,7 | 8,2 | 8,8 |
Oppland | 139 715 | 6 654 | 154 751 | 24 531 | 7,4 | 7,9 | 7,9 | 8,5 |
Buskerud | 195 681 | 15 056 | 215 259 | 31 591 | 6,9 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 8,2 |
Vestfold | 145 867 | 5 660 | 164 854 | 28 370 | 6,5 | 6,8 | 6,8 | 7,6 |
Telemark | 114 374 | 3 822 | 127 793 | 23 646 | 7,2 | 7,3 | 7,6 | 8,2 |
Aust-Agder | 62 948 | 1 421 | 70 066 | 9 287 | 6,7 | 7,2 | 7,0 | 7,5 |
Vest-Agder | 99 778 | 9 007 | 107 504 | 18 464 | 6,5 | 6,7 | 7,0 | 7,5 |
Rogaland | 228 825 | 18 815 | 257 624 | 50 348 | 5,4 | 5,7 | 5,9 | 6,4 |
Hordaland | 340 643 | 23 761 | 367 519 | 55 262 | 6,9 | 7,4 | 7,6 | 7,9 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 62 384 | 2 210 | 71 888 | 11 152 | 5,8 | 6,4 | 6,2 | 6,9 |
Møre og Romsdal | 167 553 | 12 623 | 186 005 | 32 117 | 6,7 | 7,2 | 7,3 | 7,9 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 214 369 | 9 582 | 239 682 | 40 152 | 7,1 | 7,5 | 7,6 | 8,3 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 87 670 | 9 903 | 96 261 | 18 418 | 6,8 | 7,3 | 7,8 | 8,3 |
Nordland | 183 702 | 19 259 | 192 425 | 27 835 | 7,2 | 7,8 | 8,3 | 8,4 |
Troms | 137 729 | 5 756 | 148 963 | 21 979 | 8,2 | 8,5 | 8,7 | 9,1 |
Finnmark | 68 133 | 7 139 | 73 700 | 15 280 | 8,2 | 8,4 | 9,3 | 9,8 |
1 Easter was in the second quarter in 2006, and in the first quarter in 2005. This is influential when we compare first quarter figures from these two years. Both man-days lost due to sickness absence and scheduled man-days decrease significantly during Easter compared to a normal week at this time of the year. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness absence. If we did not take the Easter week into account the sickness absence rate would have dropped nearly 0.1 percentage points for most of the groups in the first quarter of 2005. |
. |