11 Sickness absence man-days1 for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Women. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 2 20061 | Quarter 3 2006 | Sickness absence rate (per cent) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sickness absence man-days |
Change last year |
Sickness absence man-days |
Change last year |
Quarter 2 20051 |
Quarter 3 2005 |
Quarter 2 20061 |
Quarter 3 2006 |
|
TOTAL | 3 162 491 | 43 436 | 3 077 340 | 219 440 | 7,0 | 7,2 | 7,5 | 7,5 |
Østfold | 185 771 | 6 380 | 184 131 | 18 609 | 7,6 | 7,9 | 8,2 | 8,4 |
Akershus | 383 293 | -52 | 373 212 | 25 829 | 7,0 | 7,2 | 7,5 | 7,5 |
Oslo | 395 544 | 4 337 | 390 884 | 36 289 | 6,4 | 6,6 | 6,9 | 7,1 |
Hedmark | 131 603 | 1 075 | 124 392 | 2 224 | 7,5 | 8,0 | 8,3 | 8,1 |
Oppland | 128 546 | 1 763 | 126 593 | 11 945 | 7,5 | 7,6 | 8,1 | 8,2 |
Buskerud | 179 122 | 372 | 175 852 | 13 808 | 7,3 | 7,4 | 7,7 | 7,8 |
Vestfold | 138 720 | 4 573 | 136 101 | 10 775 | 6,5 | 6,9 | 7,2 | 7,4 |
Telemark | 105 505 | 3 261 | 103 191 | 6 498 | 7,0 | 7,5 | 7,7 | 7,8 |
Aust-Agder | 57 923 | -1 836 | 56 300 | 3 563 | 6,9 | 6,9 | 7,0 | 6,9 |
Vest-Agder | 92 390 | 4 912 | 94 680 | 11 434 | 6,4 | 6,8 | 7,2 | 7,5 |
Rogaland | 214 882 | 17 589 | 205 092 | 20 811 | 5,3 | 5,7 | 6,0 | 5,9 |
Hordaland | 306 560 | -814 | 291 808 | 17 204 | 7,1 | 7,2 | 7,5 | 7,4 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 60 400 | 2 005 | 58 262 | 4 067 | 6,0 | 6,3 | 6,6 | 6,5 |
Møre og Romsdal | 158 516 | 4 311 | 151 074 | 10 294 | 7,1 | 7,2 | 7,6 | 7,5 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 192 197 | -4 783 | 185 274 | 4 760 | 7,3 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 7,5 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 78 949 | 593 | 76 734 | 2 178 | 7,2 | 7,7 | 7,8 | 7,9 |
Nordland | 163 780 | -2 542 | 161 830 | 8 154 | 7,7 | 8,0 | 8,1 | 8,3 |
Troms | 128 646 | 3 195 | 123 689 | 7 630 | 8,2 | 8,6 | 9,0 | 9,0 |
Finnmark | 59 540 | -1 178 | 57 719 | 3 335 | 8,6 | 8,7 | 9,1 | 9,1 |
1 Easter was in the second quarter in 2006, and in the first quarter in 2005. This is influential when we compare second quarter figures from these two years. Both man-days lost due to sickness absence and scheduled man-days decrease significantly during Easter compared to a normal week at this time of the year. Easter has stronger influence on scheduled man-days than on man-days lost due to sickness absence. If we did not take the Easter week into account we roughly estimate that the sickness absence rate would have dropped nearly 0.1 percentage points for most of the groups in the second quarter of 2006. |