10 Sickness absence man-days1 for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Men. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 4 2007 |
Quarter 1 2008 |
Sickness absence rate (per cent) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sickness absence man-days1 |
Change last year |
Sickness absence man-days1 |
Change last year |
Quarter 4 2006 |
Quarter 1 2007 |
Quarter 4 2007 |
Quarter 1 2008 |
|
TOTAL | 2 785 555 | 94 500 | 2 829 083 | -60 402 | 4,5 | 4,7 | 4,5 | 4,7 |
Østfold | 185 493 | 9 241 | 183 952 | -7 898 | 5,5 | 5,7 | 5,6 | 5,7 |
Akershus | 285 597 | 2 739 | 291 466 | -11 132 | 4,2 | 4,3 | 4,1 | 4,3 |
Oslo | 293 115 | 6 950 | 299 018 | -11 136 | 4,0 | 4,1 | 3,9 | 4,0 |
Hedmark | 126 179 | 4 822 | 125 652 | -2 778 | 5,5 | 5,6 | 5,6 | 5,7 |
Oppland | 120 735 | 1 938 | 122 228 | -7 149 | 5,5 | 5,8 | 5,4 | 5,7 |
Buskerud | 159 289 | 1 321 | 167 280 | -4 365 | 4,9 | 5,1 | 4,8 | 5,2 |
Vestfold | 128 897 | 6 373 | 128 228 | -2 634 | 4,5 | 4,6 | 4,6 | 4,7 |
Telemark | 100 136 | 3 256 | 105 060 | -643 | 4,8 | 5,1 | 4,9 | 5,4 |
Aust-Agder | 59 798 | 1 542 | 61 445 | -2 085 | 4,6 | 4,8 | 4,5 | 4,8 |
Vest-Agder | 92 958 | 3 083 | 94 485 | -102 | 4,4 | 4,5 | 4,4 | 4,6 |
Rogaland | 200 754 | 4 384 | 210 645 | 2 902 | 3,5 | 3,6 | 3,5 | 3,7 |
Hordaland | 281 674 | 12 969 | 285 127 | -6 732 | 4,4 | 4,6 | 4,5 | 4,7 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 55 411 | 3 366 | 56 717 | 222 | 4,0 | 4,2 | 4,2 | 4,4 |
Møre og Romsdal | 143 434 | 8 045 | 144 361 | -357 | 4,3 | 4,5 | 4,4 | 4,6 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 162 569 | -146 | 168 378 | -1 634 | 4,5 | 4,5 | 4,3 | 4,6 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 81 116 | 5 609 | 83 385 | 1 801 | 5,0 | 5,2 | 5,2 | 5,5 |
Nordland | 147 561 | 9 793 | 145 471 | -3 210 | 5,1 | 5,3 | 5,3 | 5,4 |
Troms | 105 260 | 3 102 | 104 505 | -3 892 | 5,4 | 5,5 | 5,4 | 5,6 |
Finnmark | 55 344 | 6 035 | 51 556 | 342 | 6,1 | 6,2 | 6,6 | 6,4 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2008 and in the second quarter in 2007. Due to earlier observations, we estimate that if we did not take the Easter week into account, the sickness absence rate would have dropped about 0.1 percentage points. |
. |