11 Sickness absence man-days1 for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Women. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 4 2007 |
Quarter 1 2008 |
Sickness absence rate (per cent) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sickness absence man-days1 |
Change last year |
Sickness absence man-days1 |
Change last year |
Quarter 4 2006 |
Quarter 1 2007 |
Quarter 4 2007 |
Quarter 1 2008 |
|
TOTAL | 3 733 949 | 216 060 | 3 820 394 | -439 | 7,4 | 7,8 | 7,5 | 7,9 |
Østfold | 224 930 | 15 952 | 230 305 | 5 758 | 8,3 | 8,6 | 8,6 | 8,9 |
Akershus | 441 510 | 16 004 | 455 856 | -7 977 | 7,5 | 7,8 | 7,4 | 7,9 |
Oslo | 455 987 | 12 618 | 458 656 | -24 662 | 6,9 | 7,2 | 6,8 | 7,0 |
Hedmark | 152 081 | 13 431 | 153 033 | 191 | 7,8 | 8,3 | 8,4 | 8,6 |
Oppland | 149 100 | 5 211 | 156 380 | -2 505 | 8,2 | 8,8 | 8,2 | 8,9 |
Buskerud | 215 288 | 10 555 | 225 012 | -4 558 | 7,9 | 8,5 | 7,9 | 8,5 |
Vestfold | 163 907 | 11 166 | 164 328 | 406 | 7,2 | 7,4 | 7,3 | 7,5 |
Telemark | 117 282 | 3 399 | 125 110 | 2 227 | 7,5 | 7,8 | 7,4 | 8,0 |
Aust-Agder | 69 725 | 4 853 | 73 968 | 3 111 | 7,0 | 7,3 | 7,1 | 7,7 |
Vest-Agder | 110 816 | 6 963 | 115 585 | 4 887 | 7,3 | 7,4 | 7,3 | 7,8 |
Rogaland | 257 290 | 17 749 | 269 457 | 8 507 | 6,0 | 6,2 | 6,0 | 6,5 |
Hordaland | 375 065 | 28 944 | 380 846 | -947 | 7,5 | 8,0 | 7,8 | 8,1 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 70 714 | 4 268 | 72 345 | 1 638 | 6,5 | 6,7 | 6,7 | 7,1 |
Møre og Romsdal | 191 117 | 21 790 | 200 623 | 14 295 | 7,3 | 7,7 | 7,8 | 8,4 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 226 843 | 7 312 | 233 718 | 529 | 7,7 | 7,8 | 7,6 | 8,1 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 98 393 | 10 277 | 101 094 | 6 607 | 7,8 | 8,1 | 8,2 | 8,6 |
Nordland | 193 770 | 9 765 | 186 866 | -7 944 | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8,4 | 8,4 |
Troms | 147 372 | 8 620 | 144 930 | -2 299 | 8,7 | 8,9 | 8,9 | 9,1 |
Finnmark | 72 212 | 7 053 | 71 758 | 2 422 | 9,0 | 9,3 | 9,6 | 9,9 |
1Easter was in the first quarter in 2008 and in the second quarter in 2007. Due to earlier observations, we estimate that if we did not take the Easter week into account, the sickness absence rate would have dropped about 0.1 percentage points. |
. |