10 Sickness absence man-days1 for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of scheduled man-days (sickness absence rate). Men. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 1 2008 |
Quarter 2 20081 |
Sickness absence rate (per cent) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sickness absence man-days1 |
Change last year |
Sickness absence man-days1 |
Change last year |
Quarter 1 2007 |
Quarter 2 2007 |
Quarter 1 2008 |
Quarter 2 20081 |
|
TOTAL | 2 829 083 | -60 402 | 2 860 102 | 437 011 | 4,7 | 4,4 | 4,7 | 4,5 |
Østfold | 183 952 | -7 898 | 189 450 | 28 655 | 5,7 | 5,4 | 5,7 | 5,5 |
Akershus | 291 466 | -11 132 | 291 536 | 39 532 | 4,3 | 4,0 | 4,3 | 4,1 |
Oslo | 299 018 | -11 136 | 305 776 | 47 874 | 4,1 | 3,8 | 4,0 | 3,9 |
Hedmark | 125 652 | -2 778 | 125 467 | 19 579 | 5,6 | 5,2 | 5,7 | 5,4 |
Oppland | 122 228 | -7 149 | 121 339 | 17 163 | 5,8 | 5,2 | 5,7 | 5,3 |
Buskerud | 167 280 | -4 365 | 163 739 | 21 980 | 5,1 | 4,7 | 5,2 | 4,8 |
Vestfold | 128 228 | -2 634 | 133 536 | 27 824 | 4,6 | 4,2 | 4,7 | 4,6 |
Telemark | 105 060 | -643 | 102 281 | 15 858 | 5,1 | 4,6 | 5,4 | 4,9 |
Aust-Agder | 61 445 | -2 085 | 64 648 | 11 304 | 4,8 | 4,5 | 4,8 | 4,7 |
Vest-Agder | 94 485 | -102 | 95 711 | 13 882 | 4,5 | 4,3 | 4,6 | 4,3 |
Rogaland | 210 645 | 2 902 | 217 652 | 41 776 | 3,6 | 3,3 | 3,7 | 3,6 |
Hordaland | 285 127 | -6 732 | 293 832 | 49 016 | 4,6 | 4,3 | 4,7 | 4,6 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 56 717 | 222 | 56 673 | 8 650 | 4,2 | 4,0 | 4,4 | 4,2 |
Møre og Romsdal | 144 361 | -357 | 143 461 | 16 117 | 4,5 | 4,4 | 4,6 | 4,3 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 168 378 | -1 634 | 172 359 | 28 692 | 4,5 | 4,2 | 4,6 | 4,4 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 83 385 | 1 801 | 83 894 | 14 466 | 5,2 | 5,0 | 5,5 | 5,2 |
Nordland | 145 471 | -3 210 | 144 771 | 19 809 | 5,3 | 5,0 | 5,4 | 5,1 |
Troms | 104 505 | -3 892 | 104 500 | 12 181 | 5,5 | 5,2 | 5,6 | 5,2 |
Finnmark | 51 556 | 342 | 49 171 | 2 399 | 6,2 | 6,3 | 6,4 | 5,8 |
1 Easter was in the first quarter in 2008 and in the second quarter in 2007. This is influential when we compare second quarter figures from these two years. During Easter, scheduled man-days decrease more than man-days lost due to sickness absence, which leads to a higher sickness absent rate. Due to earlier observations, we estimate that if we did not take the Easter week into account, the sickness absence rate would have dropped about 0.1 percentage points in the second quarter in 2007. |
. |