10 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of contractual man-days (sickness absence rate). Men. Quarterly figures. |
Quarter 1 2009 |
Quarter 2 20091 |
Sickness absence rate (per cent) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sickness absence man-days 1 |
Change last year |
Sickness absence man-days 1 |
Change last year |
Quarter 1 2008 |
Quarter 2 2008 |
Quarter 1 2009 |
Quarter 2 20091 |
|
TOTAL | 3 212 737 | 383 654 | 2 876 516 | 26 891 | 4,7 | 4,5 | 5,1 | 5,0 |
Østfold | 212 541 | 28 589 | 195 422 | 6 298 | 5,7 | 5,5 | 6,3 | 6,4 |
Akershus | 334 308 | 42 843 | 299 748 | 8 990 | 4,3 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 4,6 |
Oslo | 332 439 | 33 420 | 301 898 | -2 403 | 4,0 | 3,9 | 4,2 | 4,2 |
Hedmark | 142 775 | 17 124 | 124 464 | -611 | 5,7 | 5,4 | 6,3 | 6,0 |
Oppland | 138 558 | 16 329 | 121 798 | 817 | 5,7 | 5,3 | 6,2 | 6,0 |
Buskerud | 198 567 | 31 287 | 176 622 | 13 563 | 5,2 | 4,7 | 5,8 | 5,6 |
Vestfold | 146 943 | 18 716 | 130 042 | -2 870 | 4,7 | 4,6 | 5,1 | 5,0 |
Telemark | 124 839 | 19 779 | 107 477 | 5 655 | 5,4 | 4,9 | 6,0 | 5,7 |
Aust-Agder | 75 764 | 14 319 | 66 100 | 1 689 | 4,8 | 4,7 | 5,7 | 5,4 |
Vest-Agder | 113 205 | 18 720 | 103 430 | 7 997 | 4,6 | 4,3 | 5,2 | 5,2 |
Rogaland | 234 480 | 23 835 | 213 429 | -3 579 | 3,7 | 3,6 | 3,9 | 3,9 |
Hordaland | 318 708 | 33 582 | 285 918 | -5 923 | 4,7 | 4,5 | 4,9 | 4,8 |
Sogn og Fjordane | 61 109 | 4 392 | 52 448 | -4 018 | 4,4 | 4,2 | 4,6 | 4,2 |
Møre og Romsdal | 160 441 | 16 080 | 147 470 | 4 267 | 4,6 | 4,3 | 4,8 | 4,8 |
Sør-Trøndelag | 192 589 | 24 211 | 166 402 | -5 414 | 4,6 | 4,4 | 5,0 | 4,7 |
Nord-Trøndelag | 90 112 | 6 726 | 82 036 | -1 550 | 5,5 | 5,2 | 5,7 | 5,7 |
Nordland | 161 488 | 16 017 | 144 096 | -410 | 5,4 | 5,1 | 5,7 | 5,6 |
Troms | 120 283 | 15 778 | 108 787 | 4 786 | 5,6 | 5,2 | 6,2 | 6,1 |
Finnmark | 53 451 | 1 895 | 48 892 | -127 | 6,4 | 5,7 | 6,3 | 6,3 |
1 Easter is in the second quarter of 2009 and first quarter in 2008. During Easter, contractual man-days decrease more than man-days lost due to sickness absence, which leads to a higher sickness absent rate. Due to earlier observations, we estimate that if we did not take the Easter week into account, the sickness absence rate would have dropped about 0.1 percentage points in the second quarter of 2009. |
. |