| 11 Sickness absence man-days for employees with sickness absence certified by a doctor, by county of residence. Figures and per cent of contractual man-days (sickness absence rate). Women. Quarterly figures. |
| Quarter 1 2009 |
Quarter 2 20091 |
Sickness absence rate (per cent) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sickness absence man-days 1 |
Change last year |
Sickness absence man-days 1 |
Change last year |
Quarter 1 2008 |
Quarter 2 2008 |
Quarter 1 2009 |
Quarter 2 20091 |
|
| TOTAL | 4 120 277 | 299 903 | 3 738 589 | -162 091 | 8,0 | 7,8 | 8,1 | 7,9 |
| Østfold | 237 547 | 7 242 | 216 018 | -19 517 | 9,0 | 8,8 | 8,8 | 8,7 |
| Akershus | 480 107 | 24 250 | 436 498 | -22 507 | 7,9 | 7,6 | 7,8 | 7,7 |
| Oslo | 502 579 | 43 923 | 449 389 | -10 396 | 7,1 | 6,7 | 7,2 | 7,0 |
| Hedmark | 159 547 | 6 514 | 142 227 | -13 746 | 8,7 | 8,5 | 8,5 | 8,2 |
| Oppland | 163 908 | 7 530 | 150 526 | -6 362 | 8,9 | 8,6 | 8,8 | 8,8 |
| Buskerud | 236 388 | 11 376 | 216 940 | -8 371 | 8,6 | 8,2 | 8,5 | 8,4 |
| Vestfold | 180 880 | 16 552 | 161 161 | -7 745 | 7,5 | 7,4 | 7,8 | 7,5 |
| Telemark | 136 374 | 11 264 | 121 921 | -4 762 | 8,1 | 7,9 | 8,3 | 8,1 |
| Aust-Agder | 87 144 | 13 175 | 76 883 | -2 014 | 7,8 | 7,9 | 8,5 | 8,2 |
| Vest-Agder | 125 114 | 9 528 | 119 247 | 502 | 7,9 | 7,7 | 7,9 | 8,1 |
| Rogaland | 297 152 | 27 706 | 274 163 | -809 | 6,6 | 6,4 | 6,7 | 6,6 |
| Hordaland | 423 859 | 43 013 | 378 605 | -11 756 | 8,1 | 7,9 | 8,4 | 8,1 |
| Sogn og Fjordane | 77 261 | 4 916 | 67 804 | -4 151 | 7,1 | 6,8 | 7,2 | 6,8 |
| Møre og Romsdal | 211 136 | 10 505 | 191 546 | -11 680 | 8,5 | 8,1 | 8,3 | 8,1 |
| Sør-Trøndelag | 259 861 | 26 144 | 235 103 | -4 880 | 8,1 | 7,9 | 8,5 | 8,3 |
| Nord-Trøndelag | 108 811 | 7 721 | 100 791 | -3 318 | 8,7 | 8,6 | 8,8 | 8,8 |
| Nordland | 197 717 | 10 852 | 180 613 | -17 554 | 8,5 | 8,6 | 8,5 | 8,3 |
| Troms | 160 041 | 15 112 | 149 081 | -5 605 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,6 | 9,7 |
| Finnmark | 74 223 | 2 473 | 69 336 | -7 483 | 10,0 | 10,1 | 9,6 | 9,8 |
| 1 Easter is in the second quarter of 2009 and first quarter in 2008. During Easter, contractual man-days decrease more than man-days lost due to sickness absence, which leads to a higher sickness absent rate. Due to earlier observations, we estimate that if we did not take the Easter week into account, the sickness absence rate would have dropped about 0.1 percentage points in the second quarter of 2009. |
| . |