Marginal increase in manufacturing output in June

Published:

Norwegian manufacturing output saw a marginal increase of 0.4 per cent from May to June 2020, according to seasonally adjusted figures. The activity was in general still strongly affected by the effects of the Corona virus, although some industries saw signs of recovery. From the 1st to the 2nd quarter of 2020 there was a severe output decline of 5.6 per cent.

The index level for Norwegian manufacturing in the second quarter of 2020 amounted to 111.5 (2005=100). The corresponding figure for the previous quarter was 118.1. Figure 1 shows that the development in seasonally-adjusted figures has been relatively stable the last year, before the output dropped significantly from March 2020.

Since March 2020 and the subsequent months are specified as outliers in the seasonal adjustment routine, the latest trend figures are not representative for the actual development. Hence, the trend figures for the latest months are not included in figure 1. For more details, see the information box regarding the Covid-19 virus by the end of the article.

Figure 1. Production development in manufacturing. Seasonally adjusted and smoothed seasonally adjusted figures. 2005=100

Smoothed seasonally adjusted Seasonally adjusted
Jan. 2015 123.7 122.4
Feb. 2015 122.7 122.6
Mar. 2015 121.8 126.8
Apr. 2015 120.9 121.4
May. 2015 120.2 119.0
June. 2015 119.5 120.1
July. 2015 118.9 115.2
Aug. 2015 118.2 118.1
Sep. 2015 117.6 118.8
Oct. 2015 116.9 115.8
Nov. 2015 116.3 116.8
Dec. 2015 115.8 115.3
Jan. 2016 115.4 115.1
Feb. 2016 115.1 115.5
Mar. 2016 114.8 117.9
Apr. 2016 114.5 114.3
May. 2016 114.1 114.8
June. 2016 113.6 112.6
July. 2016 113.1 113.8
Aug. 2016 112.6 109.9
Sep. 2016 112.4 112.3
Oct. 2016 112.4 112.1
Nov. 2016 112.6 112.2
Dec. 2016 113.0 112.7
Jan. 2017 113.5 114.3
Feb. 2017 113.9 114.2
Mar. 2017 114.2 114.1
Apr. 2017 114.4 114.2
May. 2017 114.4 114.3
June. 2017 114.3 114.3
July. 2017 114.3 114.7
Aug. 2017 114.4 110.6
Sep. 2017 114.4 114.1
Oct. 2017 114.5 114.2
Nov. 2017 114.6 114.8
Dec. 2017 114.7 115.9
Jan. 2018 114.8 113.9
Feb. 2018 114.8 114.6
Mar. 2018 114.8 115.0
Apr. 2018 114.9 115.3
May. 2018 115.1 114.7
June. 2018 115.5 115.4
July. 2018 115.8 115.9
Aug. 2018 116.3 116.6
Sep. 2018 116.8 116.1
Oct. 2018 117.4 117.7
Nov. 2018 117.8 118.0
Dec. 2018 118.2 118.6
Jan. 2019 118.5 118.4
Feb. 2019 118.9 118.3
Mar. 2019 119.2 117.0
Apr. 2019 119.4 119.9
May. 2019 119.6 120.2
June. 2019 119.7 119.1
July. 2019 119.7 120.2
Aug. 2019 119.6 118.8
Sep. 2019 119.5 119.7
Oct. 2019 119.4 119.7
Nov. 2019 119.4 119.2
Dec. 2019 119.3 119.2
Jan. 2020 119.3 119.7
Feb. 2020 119.3 119.1
Mar. 2020 115.5
Apr. 2020 113.6
May. 2020 110.2
June. 2020 110.6

Monthly change: sectorial differences in manufacturing output in June

According to seasonally-adjusted figures, manufacturing output saw a minor increase of 0.4 per cent from May to June 2020. This increase comes after three months with severe output decline. The industry grouping refined petroleum, chemicals and pharmaceuticals contributed the most to the overall production increase, followed by the industry grouping furniture and manufacturing n.e.c. These two industry groupings registered an increase of 4.5 and 19 per cent respectively.

On the other hand, food and beverages as well as basic metals had the largest negative contributions in this period. The decline in food and beverages can partly be explained by lower production of fish. The decline within basic metals is related to a poor market situation caused by actions taken in order to stop the spreading of the Corona-virus.

Figure 2. Selected industries in manufacturing. Seasonally adjusted, monthly change. June 2020 / May 2020

Monthly percentage change
Basic metals -6.3
Food, beverages and tobacco -3.1
Refined petro., chemicals, pharmac. 4.5
Furniture and manufacturing n.e.c. 18.6

Three-month change: historical fall in manufacturing production

According to seasonally-adjusted figures, manufacturing output saw a clear fall of as much as 5.6 per cent from the 1st to the 2nd quarter of 2020. This is the largest quarterly output decline ever registered for this time series which goes back to 1990. The steep fall is due to the fact that all three months during this quarter have seen low production levels as a result of the Corona-situation. Ships, boats and oil platforms contributed the most to this decline with a substantial drop of as much as 26 per cent.

On the other hand, food products contributed to dampen the overall output decline somewhat with a production increase in this period. The growth must be seen in context with high demand from the Norwegian grocery sector.

Monthly change: solid output growth in the Euro area in May 2020

Estimated figures from Eurostat, the EU’s statistical office, indicate that manufacturing output in the Euro area had a solid growth of as much as 13 per cent from April to May 2020. This strong output growth comes after two months with severe production decline caused by the actions taken to mitigate the spreading of the Covid-19 virus. After the Member States eased on some of the measures, the manufacturing production increased. However, the output is still low compared with the same period last year.

In the same period, Norwegian manufacturing production went down with 3 per cent. In Sweden manufacturing output increased by 1.1 per cent, while Denmark had a decline of 3 per cent.

For more information on the development in European manufacturing sector in May, see this article from Eurostat.

Figure 3. Index of production for manufacturing. Euro area and Norway (2015=100). Seasonally adjusted

Euro area Norway
Jan. 2015 97.4 102.5
Feb. 2015 99.8 102.7
Mar. 2015 100.6 106.3
Apr. 2015 99.8 101.7
May. 2015 100.2 99.7
June. 2015 100.3 100.6
July. 2015 100.7 96.5
Aug. 2015 100.2 99.0
Sep. 2015 100.2 99.5
Oct. 2015 100.3 97.0
Nov. 2015 100.0 97.9
Dec. 2015 100.5 96.6
Jan. 2016 103.4 96.4
Feb. 2016 101.3 96.7
Mar. 2016 100.4 98.8
Apr. 2016 101.7 95.8
May. 2016 100.3 96.2
June. 2016 101.3 94.3
July. 2016 101.4 95.4
Aug. 2016 101.6 92.1
Sep. 2016 101.6 94.1
Oct. 2016 102.7 93.9
Nov. 2016 102.9 94.0
Dec. 2016 102.5 94.4
Jan. 2017 101.9 95.8
Feb. 2017 103.2 95.7
Mar. 2017 103.3 95.5
Apr. 2017 104.1 95.7
May. 2017 104.3 95.7
June. 2017 103.6 95.8
July. 2017 105.6 96.1
Aug. 2017 106.2 92.6
Sep. 2017 105.9 95.6
Oct. 2017 105.6 95.7
Nov. 2017 108.2 96.2
Dec. 2017 108.8 97.1
Jan. 2018 107.2 95.4
Feb. 2018 105.3 96.0
Mar. 2018 105.3 96.3
Apr. 2018 106.0 96.6
May. 2018 107.3 96.1
June. 2018 106.9 96.7
July. 2018 105.7 97.1
Aug. 2018 106.7 97.7
Sep. 2018 106.1 97.2
Oct. 2018 106.3 98.6
Nov. 2018 105.2 98.8
Dec. 2018 105.3 99.3
Jan. 2019 105.8 99.2
Feb. 2019 106.2 99.1
Mar. 2019 105.8 98.0
Apr. 2019 105.1 100.4
May. 2019 106.0 100.7
June. 2019 104.4 99.8
July. 2019 104.4 100.7
Aug. 2019 104.2 99.6
Sep. 2019 104.3 100.2
Oct. 2019 104.1 100.2
Nov. 2019 103.9 99.8
Dec. 2019 102.2 99.8
Jan. 2020 104.1 100.3
Feb. 2020 104.1 99.8
Mar. 2020 90.8 96.8
Apr. 2020 73.1 95.2
May. 2020 82.9 92.3

Three-month change: minor decrease in the total production index

According to seasonally-adjusted figures, the total production index (PII) covering extraction, mining, manufacturing and electricity supply saw a minor decrease of 0.5 per cent in the second quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter. Extraction of crude petroleum had a growth of 6.8 cent, while extraction of natural gas decreased with 4.7 per cent. For more details about oil and gas extraction in this quarter, see the press release from The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.

Within support activities for petroleum and natural gas extraction, there was a severe output drop of as much as 15 per cent in the second quarter of 2020 compared to the first. Strict infection control rules combined with the low oil price and reduced exploration investments on the Norwegian continental shelf explains the low activity level.

In the same period, mining and quarrying saw a decline of 0.9 per cent, while Norwegian electricity supply increased by more than 15 per cent. The strong production level within electricity supply can partly be explained by increased production of hydro power in order to make room in the reservoirs for melting snow.

1 The index value for period m is the average of period m, m-1 and m-2.

Figure 4. Production development. Seasonally adjusted. Three-month moving average¹. 2005=100

Manufacturing Extraction, mining, manufacturing and elec. Extraction and related services
Jan. 2010 109.4 92.3 85.1
Feb. 2010 109.7 92.0 84.7
Mar. 2010 110.1 91.6 84.4
Apr. 2010 110.8 90.9 83.8
May. 2010 110.3 90.3 83.6
June. 2010 111.1 89.3 82.2
July. 2010 111.8 88.1 80.4
Aug. 2010 112.0 84.9 75.7
Sep. 2010 111.7 83.6 73.7
Oct. 2010 111.4 84.8 75.3
Nov. 2010 112.6 87.4 77.9
Dec. 2010 112.6 89.1 80.0
Jan. 2011 112.7 87.7 78.4
Feb. 2011 112.6 87.0 77.9
Mar. 2011 113.1 85.8 76.5
Apr. 2011 112.9 84.7 74.9
May. 2011 113.0 82.3 71.1
June. 2011 111.7 81.7 70.0
July. 2011 110.2 81.9 69.7
Aug. 2011 109.6 84.3 72.6
Sep. 2011 110.9 85.6 74.2
Oct. 2011 112.9 86.1 74.5
Nov. 2011 113.8 86.4 74.7
Dec. 2011 113.5 85.3 73.6
Jan. 2012 113.9 86.6 74.8
Feb. 2012 113.9 87.3 75.1
Mar. 2012 114.0 88.4 75.8
Apr. 2012 113.7 88.4 75.5
May. 2012 114.4 88.5 75.5
June. 2012 114.8 88.9 76.0
July. 2012 115.3 88.0 75.1
Aug. 2012 115.7 87.3 74.0
Sep. 2012 116.3 85.0 70.4
Oct. 2012 116.8 85.2 70.4
Nov. 2012 116.8 84.3 69.3
Dec. 2012 116.7 85.3 70.9
Jan. 2013 117.2 83.8 70.1
Feb. 2013 117.7 82.4 69.3
Mar. 2013 118.0 80.7 68.4
Apr. 2013 118.8 81.1 68.9
May. 2013 119.0 82.8 71.1
June. 2013 120.4 84.0 72.4
July. 2013 120.8 85.1 73.6
Aug. 2013 121.1 84.5 72.8
Sep. 2013 120.8 83.9 72.1
Oct. 2013 120.3 81.6 69.4
Nov. 2013 120.1 81.5 69.3
Dec. 2013 120.2 82.0 69.9
Jan. 2014 120.7 83.7 71.5
Feb. 2014 121.3 84.3 71.8
Mar. 2014 121.9 85.2 72.3
Apr. 2014 121.9 85.4 72.3
May. 2014 122.2 84.2 70.2
June. 2014 123.0 83.9 69.4
July. 2014 123.6 83.6 68.8
Aug. 2014 125.2 84.7 70.2
Sep. 2014 124.5 85.7 71.8
Oct. 2014 125.4 87.2 73.6
Nov. 2014 124.6 87.7 74.4
Dec. 2014 125.4 87.4 73.7
Jan. 2015 124.1 86.1 72.4
Feb. 2015 123.4 86.1 72.7
Mar. 2015 123.9 86.3 72.9
Apr. 2015 123.6 85.4 71.7
May. 2015 122.4 84.9 71.3
June. 2015 120.2 85.0 72.0
July. 2015 118.1 86.2 74.2
Aug. 2015 117.8 87.0 75.4
Sep. 2015 117.4 87.9 76.7
Oct. 2015 117.6 88.1 77.1
Nov. 2015 117.1 87.3 76.2
Dec. 2015 116.0 85.4 74.1
Jan. 2016 115.7 85.2 73.7
Feb. 2016 115.3 85.3 73.9
Mar. 2016 116.2 85.7 73.7
Apr. 2016 115.9 86.1 74.2
May. 2016 115.7 86.4 74.7
June. 2016 113.9 85.3 73.8
July. 2016 113.7 84.9 73.5
Aug. 2016 112.1 83.2 71.8
Sep. 2016 112.0 81.9 70.1
Oct. 2016 111.4 82.4 71.0
Nov. 2016 112.2 83.9 73.0
Dec. 2016 112.3 85.8 75.4
Jan. 2017 113.1 85.7 74.3
Feb. 2017 113.7 85.9 73.6
Mar. 2017 114.2 87.0 74.2
Apr. 2017 114.2 87.2 74.5
May. 2017 114.2 87.2 74.3
June. 2017 114.3 87.1 73.8
July. 2017 114.4 86.9 73.4
Aug. 2017 113.2 87.0 73.9
Sep. 2017 113.1 87.5 74.8
Oct. 2017 113.0 86.9 74.0
Nov. 2017 114.4 86.1 72.4
Dec. 2017 115.0 84.9 70.4
Jan. 2018 114.9 85.9 70.8
Feb. 2018 114.8 86.9 71.1
Mar. 2018 114.5 87.8 71.2
Apr. 2018 115.0 87.3 70.4
May. 2018 115.0 86.4 69.5
June. 2018 115.1 86.9 70.9
July. 2018 115.3 87.3 71.5
Aug. 2018 116.0 88.6 73.2
Sep. 2018 116.2 88.3 72.4
Oct. 2018 116.8 88.8 72.2
Nov. 2018 117.3 87.9 70.5
Dec. 2018 118.1 87.3 69.1
Jan. 2019 118.3 85.9 68.2
Feb. 2019 118.4 84.7 67.4
Mar. 2019 117.9 83.2 66.7
Apr. 2019 118.4 82.6 65.8
May. 2019 119.0 82.7 65.6
June. 2019 119.7 82.5 64.8
July. 2019 119.8 82.4 64.2
Aug. 2019 119.4 81.6 63.0
Sep. 2019 119.6 81.5 62.6
Oct. 2019 119.4 81.9 63.5
Nov. 2019 119.5 83.6 66.0
Dec. 2019 119.4 85.5 69.3
Jan. 2020 119.4 85.8 70.7
Feb. 2020 119.3 86.3 71.8
Mar. 2020 118.1 86.7 72.6
Apr. 2020 116.1 87.6 73.6
May. 2020 113.1 87.5 73.8
June. 2020 111.5 86.3 72.9
.

The seasonal adjustment routine has been adjusted during the Corona-crisis

Thursday 12th of March 2020 the Norwegian government introduced actions against the spreading of the Corona-virus in Norway. Several manufacturing establishment have been affected by these measures, and this has led to a change in the activity pattern compared to what we usually observe. Hence, the seasonal adjustment routine during the Corona- crisis is done in such a way that the figures during the crisis (from March), are not included in the basis for the calculation of the seasonal pattern. Technically, in the seasonal adjustment routine this is done by specifying March and following months as outliers.

This implies that normal trend figures will not be calculated, and instead the trend will follow the seasonal adjusted figures. One important exception is the last observation, where the trend will be an extrapolated figure where the last observation is not included. The trend figures from, and including, March 2020 will therefore be difficult to interpret.

The seasonal adjustment routine of Statics Norway is in line with the recommendations of Eurostat.

 

Response rate for June 2020

The data collection for June has been conducted in the period from the 30th of June to the 5th of August 2020. The response rate for June 2020 is 92 per cent, while the corresponding rate for the same period last year was 97 per cent.

Contact