Content
Published:
This is an archived release.
Highest activity in urban areas
In the period 1985 to 2004, 1.3 per cent of the coastline, corresponding to 1 100 km, has been developed. Reports from the municipalities show that the majority of dispensations are granted in the shore zone in and around cities.
Important terms
The shore zone is the area situated less than 100 metres from the shoreline measured in the horizontal plane. The term "developed coastline" is defined as areas where buildings exist in the adjacent shore zone. The portion of developed coastline has been calculated on basis of the official register for Ground Properties, Addresses and Buildings (GAB), and the coastline from the map series N50, digital data from maps in the scale 1:50 000. Both of these data sources are developed and administrated by the Norwegian Mapping Authority. The calculations of development over time are done on basis of the "date of first use" for new buildings. Annexes and extensions have not been counted/defined as changes. |
Everyone shall have the opportunity to take part in outdoor recreation as a healthy and environmental sound leisure activity that provides a sense of well - being , both near their homes and in the countryside . This is the goal for outdoor life in the Norwegian environmental policy. In this aspect the coastal zone is very valuable, offering opportunities for outdoor recreation. At the same time these areas are under great pressure from developments that restrict public access.
Several key indicators have been developed as tools for supervising the development of the national environmental targets outlined in White Paper no 25 from the Storting. (Stortingsmelding nr. 25 (2002-2003)). Access to the coastal zone is one of these key indicators.
The coastline of the Norwegian mainland is 83 281 km, including islands, fjords and bays. This corresponds to more than twice the Earth's circumference at equator. Most urban settlements and a large part of the developed areas, including weekend and holiday homes, are situated along the coast.
National target in danger?
It is a national target that valuable areas for outdoor recreation should be protected. Despite of this there has been some development in the coastal zone. For the country as a whole 23.5 per cent of the coastline is less than 100 meters from the nearest building (as registered in GAB 01.01.2004). This corresponds to halfway around equator. From Østfold to Hordaland, which is given particular attention in the environmental policy, as much as 39.1 per cent of the coastline is less than 100 meters from the nearest building. This suggests that public access to the coastal zone may be severely restricted in some areas. Developments in the coastal zone are particularly common in and around large urban settlements and in areas with many weekend and holiday homes (figure 1 and 2).
The municipalities in the inner parts of the Oslo fjord have the largest portion of developed coastline. The urban settlements of Oslo are occupying a considerable portion of these areas.
Highest pressure around the large cities
The highest proportion of coastline less than 100 metres from buildings are in and around the large cities. The results are presented by centrality. That is, each municipality in Norway has been classified according to travel time to the closest urban settlement over a certain size. The central municipalities have more of the coastline influenced by buildings than less central municipalities. 39.1 per cent of the coastline in the central municipalities is less than 100 metres from a building, while the corresponding figure for the least central municipalities are 17.3 per cent. Also in the time period from 1985 to 2004, the building activity has been higher in more central municipalities compared to less central municipalities.
§ 17-2 of the Planning and Building act are restricting developments in the coastal zone. Building and development has to be carried out through dispensations. Numbers reported from municipalities to the state through KOSTRA (municipalities to the state reporting) during the last 3 years show that the number of granted dispensations per kilometer coastline is 5 times higher in central areas compared to the less central, even though a smaller part of the applications are granted in the central areas. This suggests that even though the municipalities in central areas are more restrictive than others, there is a great pressure on the coastline in these areas. The high number of granted dispensations is contributing to the central areas having the highest speed of development.
The municipalities along the coast from Østfold to Hordaland are somewhat more restrictive than the municipalities further north. During the period 2001-2003, 0,87 dispensations were granted per 10 kilometer of coastline for Hordaland-Østfold, while the number was 0,2 north of Hordaland.
Portion of applications of dispensations from the development restrictions
that was granted or rejected. The whole country, the coast from østfold-Hordaland and the coast from Sogn og Fjordane-Finnmark. 200-2003. Per cent |
Number of applications of dispensations | Percentage granted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | 2002 | 20031 | 2001 | 2002 | 20031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The whole country | 1 636 | 1 570 | 1 175 | 67 | 69 | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The coast østfold to Hordaland | 1 085 | 1 016 | 676 | 61 | 65 | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The coast Sogn og Fjordane to Finnmark | 551 | 554 | 499 | 79 | 76 | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
østfold | 85 | 97 | 45 | 75 | 68 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Akershus | 41 | 23 | 30 | 49 | 65 | 63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oslo | 0 | .. | 0 | . | . | . | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buskerud | 14 | 24 | 2 | 64 | 21 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vestfold | 86 | 161 | 42 | 59 | 66 | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Telemark | 118 | 96 | 44 | 48 | 43 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aust-Agder | 206 | 121 | 85 | 56 | 72 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vest-Agder | 142 | 149 | 89 | 73 | 67 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rogaland | 117 | 106 | 100 | 44 | 52 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hordaland | 276 | 239 | 239 | 70 | 76 | 73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sogn og Fjordane | 129 | 89 | 73 | 81 | 79 | 81 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Møre og Romsdal | 124 | 135 | 123 | 72 | 72 | 85 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sør-Trøndelag | 71 | 66 | 34 | 82 | 80 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nord-Trøndelag | 38 | 41 | 31 | 79 | 63 | 68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nordland | 96 | 119 | 110 | 80 | 80 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Troms | 71 | 83 | 122 | 83 | 82 | 89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finnmark Finnmárku | 22 | 21 | 6 | 73 | 52 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
From 2003 onwards only dispensations regarding new buildings are reported. Reporting for previous years
comprised all dispensations in the shore zone. |
Contact
-
Tom Anders Engebakken
E-mail: tom.engebakken@ssb.no
tel.: (+47) 47 46 47 66
-
Jørn Kristian Undelstvedt
E-mail: jorn.kristian.undelstvedt@ssb.no
tel.: (+47) 94 50 68 64