Discussion papers
Discussion papers presenterer forskningsstoff som sikter mot å ende opp som en internasjonal publikasjon og distribueres for kommentarer og forslag.
Et Discussion paper kan være lengre og fyldigere enn det som er vanlig for en artikkel ved at blant annet ugjennomsiktige mellomrekninger, resultater og bakgrunnsmateriale blir inkludert.
-
Education and cancer risk
Discussion Papers no. 777
Edwin Leuven, Erik Plug og Marte RønningPublisert:
There exists a strong educational gradient in cancer risk, which has been documented in a wide range of populations. Yet relatively little is known about the extent to which education is causally linked to cancer incidence and mortality.
-
The relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to cancer risk and cancer mortality in Norway
Discussion Papers no. 776
Edwin Leuven, Erik Plug og Marte RønningPublisert:
Using Norwegian cancer registry data we study twin and non-twin siblings to decompose variation in cancer at most common sites and cancer mortality into a genetic, shared environment and individual (unshared environmental) component.
-
Calculating the real return of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global by alternative measures of the deflator
Discussion Papers no. 775
Andreas Benedictow og Pål BougPublisert:
According to the present guidelines for fiscal policy, the use of oil revenues in the Norwegian economy should over time equal the expected real return on the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG).
-
Is universal child care leveling the playing field?
Discussion Papers no. 774
Tarjei Havnes og Magne MogstadPublisert:
We assess the case for universal child care programs in the context of a Norwegian reform which led to a large-scale expansion of subsidized child care.
-
Adjusting maternal mortality data for international comparisons
Discussion Papers no. 773
Susie Jentoft, Vibeke Oestreich Nielsen og Dag Roll-HansenPublisert:
Adjusting maternal mortality data for international comparisons. The case of vital registration systems
-
Pick a number
Discussion Papers no. 772
Synøve Nygaard Andersen og Torbjørn SkardhamarPublisert:
Recidivism studies differ with respect to samples, definitions and follow-up periods. While it is recognized that such differences hamper comparability, there is little systematic knowledge about how recidivism figures are affected.
-
Time aggregation and state dependence in welfare receipt
Discussion Papers no. 771
Manudeep Bhuller, Christian N. Brinch og Sebastian KönigsPublisert:
Dynamic discrete-choice models have been an important tool in studies of state dependence in benefit receipt. An assumption of such models is that benefit receipt sequences follow a conditional Markov process.
-
Taxes on the internet
Discussion Papers no. 770
Erlend Eide Bø, Joel Slemrod og Thor Olav ThoresenPublisert:
Supporters of public disclosure of personal tax information point to its deterrent effect on tax evasion, but this effect has not been empirically explored.
-
Income mobility as an equalizer of permanent income
Discussion Papers no. 769
Rolf Aaberge og Magne MogstadPublisert:
Do market-orientated economies with relatively large cross-sectional levels of inequality have higher income mobility and therefore less permanent inequality? To answer this question, we introduce a formal representation of income mobility as an equalizer of permanent income.
-
Diffusion of climate technologies in the presence of commitment problems
Discussion Papers no. 768
Taran Fæhn og Elisabeth Thuestad IsaksenPublisert:
Publicly announced GHG mitigation targets and emissions pricing strategies by individual governments may suffer from inherent commitment problems. When emission prices are perceived as short-lived, socially cost-effective upfront investment in climate technologies may be hampered.
-
The intergenerational transfer of the employment gender gap
Discussion Papers no. 767
Venke Furre Haaland, Mari Rege, Kjetil Telle og Mark VotrubaPublisert:
Despite well-documented convergence during the later years of the 20th century, labor market attachment remains markedly higher for men than for women.
-
Pro-cyclical mortality
Discussion Papers no. 766
Venke Furre Haaland og Kjetil TellePublisert:
Using variation across geographical regions, a number of studies from the U.S. and other developed countries have found more deaths in economic upturns and less deaths in economic downturns. We use data from regions in Norway for 1977-2008 and find the same procyclical patterns.
-
Distributional benchmarking in tax policy evaluations
Discussion Papers no. 765
Thor Olav Thoresen, Zhiyang Jia og Peter J. LambertPublisert:
Given an objective to exploit cross-sectional micro data to evaluate the distributional effects of tax policies over a time period, the practitioner of public economics will find that the relevant literature offers a wide variety of empirical approaches.
-
Are closely-held firms tax shelters?
Discussion Papers no. 764
Annette Alstadsæter, Wojciech Kopczuk og Kjell TellePublisert:
In 2004 Norwegian authorities announced a reform introducing dividend taxation for personal (but not corporate) owners to take effect starting in 2006. This change provided incentives to maximize dividends in 2004 and 2005, and to retain earnings in the following years.
-
A theory for ranking distribution functions
Discussion Papers no. 763
Rolf Aaberge, Tarjei Havnes og Magne MogstadPublisert:
When is one distribution (of income, consumption, or some other economic variable) more equal or better than another? This question has proven difficult to answer in situations where distribution functions intersect and no unambiguous ranking can be attained without introducing weaker criteria than second-degree stochastic dominance.
-
The ins and outs of top income mobility
Discussion Papers no. 762
Rolf Aaberge, Anthony B. Atkinson og Jørgen ModalsliPublisert:
This paper is concerned with the question of whether top income earners are permanently there or only temporarily receive the highest incomes.
-
U.S. versus Sweden
Discussion Papers no. 761
Rolf Aaberge og Lennart FloodPublisert:
An essential difference between the design of the Swedish and the US in-work tax credit systems relates to their functional forms.
-
Becoming “We” instead of “I”
Discussion Papers no. 760
Jocelyn Donze og Trude GunnesPublisert:
This article studies how a firm fosters formal and informal interaction among its employees to create a collective identity and positively influence their effort.
-
Gender equality in the family and childbearing
Discussion Papers no. 759
Lars Dommermuth, Bryndl Hohmann-Marriott og Trude LappegårdPublisert:
This study focuses on the possible effect of gender equality and equity in the family on the transition to first, second and third births.
-
Asset market participation and portfolio choice over the life-cycle
Discussion Papers no. 758
Andreas Fagereng, Charles Gottlieb og Luigi GuisoPublisert:
We study the life cycle of portfolio allocation following for 15 years a large random sample of Norwegian households using error-free data on all components of households' investments drawn from the Tax Registry.