Discussion Papers no. 169
Some Norwegian politicians' use of cost-benefit analysis
Members of the Norwegian Parliament were interviewed about the decision process concerning national road investments. Most of them found cost-benefit analysis useful, but apparently not as a device for ranking projects. Rather, the cost-benefit ratio was used to pick project proposals requiring political attention among the large number of projects included in the plan. However, information about project-related local conflicts seemed to be used much more extensively for this latter purpose. Attitudes towards cost-benefit analysis varied along the left-right political axis. These findings are shown to be consistent with a hypothesis that politicians rationally maximize subjective perceptions of social welfare.
Om publikasjonen
- Tittel
-
Some Norwegian politicians' use of cost-benefit analysis
- Ansvarlig
-
Karine Nyborg
- Serie og -nummer
-
Discussion Papers no. 169
- Utgiver
-
Statistics Norway, Research department
- Emne
-
Discussion Papers
- Antall sider
-
35
- Målform
-
Engelsk
- Om Discussion Papers
-
Discussion papers comprise research papers intended for international journals and books. A preprint of a Discussion Paper may be longer and more elaborate than a standard journal article as it may include intermediate calculations, background material etc.
Kontakt
-
SSBs informasjonstjeneste