Discussion papers
Discussion papers presenterer forskningsstoff som sikter mot å ende opp som en internasjonal publikasjon og distribueres for kommentarer og forslag.
Et Discussion paper kan være lengre og fyldigere enn det som er vanlig for en artikkel ved at blant annet ugjennomsiktige mellomrekninger, resultater og bakgrunnsmateriale blir inkludert.
-
High school dropout for marginal students: Evidence from randomized exam form
Discussion Papers no. 894
Martin Eckhoff Andresen og Sturla A. LøkkenPublisert:
We exploit the assignment of exam form in a high-stakes Norwegian high school exam to estimate the impact of exam form on exam results, later school performance, graduation and longer run outcomes.
-
Spillover bias in multigenerational income regressions
Discussion Papers no. 897
Jørgen Modalsli og Kelly VostersPublisert:
Intergenerational persistence estimates are susceptible to several well-documented biases arising from income measurement, and it has become standard practice to construct income measures to mitigate these.
-
Buy to let: Investment buyers in a housing search model
Discussion Papers no. 896
Erlend Eide BøPublisert:
This paper explores and explains how buy-to-let investors affect housing price dynamics
-
Robustness of the Norwegian wage formation system and free EU labour movement: Evidence from wage data for natives
Discussion Papers no. 895
Bjorn Dapi, Ragnar Nymoen og Victoria SparrmanPublisert:
Norway experienced a high immigration flow after the EEA directive in 2004 stating workers right to free movement within the European Union and EEA-countries.
-
Is the marginal cost of public funds equal to one?
Discussion Papers no. 893
Bjart HoltsmarkPublisert:
In a recent article Bas Jacobs found that the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) is one when taxation gives second best resource allocation.
-
Effects of higher required rates of return on the tax take in an oil province
Discussion Papers no. 892
Lars LindholtPublisert:
For different reasons the oil companies might apply higher required rates of return than they did some years ago, and this will have consequences for investments and tax revenue in oil provinces.
-
Collusive tax evasion by employers and employees
Discussion Papers no. 891
Marie Bjørneby, Annette Alstadsæter, Kjetil TellePublisert:
Third-party reporting and employers’ tax withholding are powerful compliance mechanisms, as long as the employer and employee do not collude to evade.
-
Regional variation in healthcare utilization and mortality
Discussion Papers no. 890
Anna Godøy and Ingrid HuitfeldtPublisert:
Geographic variation in healthcare utilization has raised concerns of possible inefficiencies in healthcare supply, as differences are often not reflected in health outcomes.
-
Spending the night? Provider incentives, capacity constraints and patient outcomes
Discussion Papers no. 889
Ingrid HuitfeldtPublisert:
Healthcare providers’ response to payment incentives may have consequences for both fiscal spending and patient health. This paper studies the effects of a change in the payment scheme for hospitals in Norway.
-
Local governments, in-kind transfers, and economic inequality
Discussion Papers no. 888
Rolf Aaberge, Lasse Eika, Audun Langørgen, Magne MogstadPublisert:
We examine how in-kind transfers provided by local governments affect economic inequality. The allocation of in-kind transfers to households and the adjustment for differences in needs are derived from a model of local government spending behavior.
-
Transitions from first unions among immigrants and their descendants: The role of partner choice
Discussion Papers no. 887
Kenneth Aarskaug Wiik, Lars Dommermuth, Jennifer A. HollandPublisert:
The family life courses of immigrants and their descendants, particularly intermarriage and the timing of marriage and childbearing, have been widely studied as indicators of societal integration.
-
Social networks and tax avoidance: Evidence from a well-defined Norwegian tax shelter
Discussion Papers no. 886
Annette Alstadsæter, Wojciech Kopczuk, and Kjetil TellePublisert:
In 2005, over 8% of Norwegian shareholders transferred their shares to new (legal) tax shelters intended to defer taxation of capital gains and dividends that would otherwise be taxable in the aftermath of 2006 reform.
-
An up-to-date joint labor supply and child care choice model
Discussion Papers no. 885
Thor O. Thoresen and Trine E. VattøPublisert:
Norwegian parents of preschool children base their care choices on a completely different choice set from their predecessor.
-
Mortality shifts and mortality compression
Discussion Papers no. 884
Publisert:
The aim of the paper is to verify whether the projections predict a continuation of the ongoing compression in mortality and of the steady upward shift in the ages at which people die.
-
On the effects of linking voluntary cap-and-trade systems for CO2 emissions
Discussion Papers no. 883
Publisert:
Linkage of cap-and-trade systems is typically advocated by economists on a general analogy with the beneficial linking of free-trade areas and on the specific grounds that linkage will ensure cost effectiveness among the linked jurisdictions.
-
Workload, staff composition, and sickness absence
Discussion Papers no. 882
Trude Gunnes, Nina Drange, and Kjetil TellePublisert:
Persistently high workload may raise sickness absence with associated costs to firms and society.
-
Child care, parental labor supply and tax revenue
Discussion Papers no. 881
Martin Eckhoff Andresen og Tarjei HavnesPublisert:
We study the impact of child care for toddlers on the labor supply of mothers and fathers in Norway.
-
Universal child care and inequality of opportunity
Discussion Papers no. 880
Nina Drange and Kjetil TellePublisert:
Encouraging effects from random assignments of intensive and high-quality early child care to disadvantaged children have spurred hopes that publicly funded universal child care can improve human development and social mobility.
-
The marginal cost of public funds in large welfare state countries
Discussion Papers no. 879
Geir H. M. BjertnæsPublisert:
The marginal cost of public funds (MCF) is substantial in generous welfare state countries according to Kleven and Kreiner (2006).
-
Public R&D Support and Firms’ Performance
Discussion Papers no. 878
Øivind A. Nilsen, Arvid Raknerud and Diana-Cristina IancuPublisert:
We analyse all the major sources of direct and indirect R&D subsidies in Norway in the period 2002-2013 and compare their effects on individual firms’ performance.