Labour force survey, seasonally-adjusted figures, February 2006

Unemployment in February 2006 (the January-March period) was down by 15 000 from November 2005 (October-December). This is consistent with the long term trend since the summer of 2005. Seasonally adjusted figures of registered unemployment at job centres show a decline of 8 000 people from November 2005 to February 2006.

From November 2005 to February 2006, the number of employed increased by 24 000 people. Employment has shown a strong growth since the summer of 2005.

Unemployment down in Germany

The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for Norway was 3.9 per cent in February 2006, compared to 4.5 per cent in November 2005. The rate in the EU15 area remained unchanged at 7.7 per cent, but fell in the OECD area from 6.5 to 6.3 per cent. In the same period, unemployment fell from 5.0 to 4.8 per cent in the USA. In Denmark, the rate increased from 4.1 to 4.4 per cent, while Finland had a decline from 8.3 to 8.1 per cent. From November to February, unemployment fell from 9.3 to 9.1 per cent in France, and from 9.3 to 8.9 per cent in Germany, according to figures from the OECD and Eurostat .

From November 2005 to February 2006, man-weeks worked fell by 16 000, but this is inside the LFS error margin. Therefore, the last man-weeks worked figure does not change the impression of an upward trend since the beginning of 2004.

Changes in the Labour Force Survey from 2006

With effect from January 2006, some improvements have been made in the Norwegian LFS. This will make the employment and unemployment figures more comparable with figures from the EU countries. In addition, actual working hours will be measured more accurately. Therefore, the changes have lead to a level shift in the LFS figures. To maximize the comparability before/after 2006, the figures for the months in 2006 have been calculated according to the LFS prior to the changes.

Quarterly LFS figures, i.e. not seasonally adjusted, are presented in a separate article . The accompanying tables contain figures for the first quarter of 2006, both according the LFS before and after the change. This will give an insight in the effects of the LFS changes on the various figures. For more details on the LFS, the seasonal adjustment method and the changes in the LFS, you can click on the links on the left side of this page.

Uncertain figures

The purpose of making adjustments for seasonal variations is to describe the development over the last year and provide figures of change between the last two three-month periods, corrected for normal seasonal variations. In order to reduce uncertainty, the published series are three-month moving averages of the seasonally adjusted figures. For instance, the figures for February represent the average of the estimates for January, February and March.

Tables:

• Table 1. Employment and unemployment for persons aged 16-74 years, seasonally adjusted, three-months moving average. Absolute figures in 1000 and unemployed persons in per cent of the labour force.